Research involving animals and animal welfare
The AO Research Institute Davos (ARI) conducts research to develop and evaluate new treatments, implants, and technologies in orthopedics and trauma care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes.
The ARI applies a range of research methodologies, including computer models, cell culture, bioreactors, and animal studies.
Currently, other research methodologies can’t fully replace animal research to investigate the multifactorial disorders of the musculoskeletal system. Additionally, regulatory bodies require animal research to ensure that treatment methods are safe for future human use.
The ARI is committed to conducting research involving animals only when scientifically and ethically justified, and when alternative methods are insufficient to answer a research question.
Legal and ethical framework
All animal research at the ARI is:
- conducted in accordance with Swiss animal welfare legislation
- reviewed and approved by cantonal authorities
- subject to regular inspections and oversight
Before approval, each study is assessed for:
- scientific necessity
- expected benefit
- animal welfare impact
- availability of alternatives
Commitment to transparency and the 3R principles
The ARI applies the 3R principles—replacement, reduction, and refinement—as a core requirement in the planning and conduct of all animal studies.Replacement
Animal experiments are avoided wherever scientifically possible. The ARI actively uses and develops alternative methods, including laboratory based, computational, and biomechanical approaches.
Reduction
Studies are designed to use the minimum number of animals required to obtain reliable and meaningful results, supported by appropriate experimental design, statistical planning, and the use of analyses such as CT scans, which are non-invasive and allow measurements within the same animal over time.
Refinement
Procedures, housing, and handling are continuously refined to minimize pain, suffering, and distress and to support animal well-being throughout the study.
Transparency and public dialogue
The ARI supports the Swiss Transparency Agreement on Animal Research (STAAR). In line with this commitment, the ARI provides clear, contextualized information about why and how animal research is conducted.
Animals used in research
Where animal research is required, the ARI primarily works with:- rodents (mice and rats)
- rabbits
- sheep, which are bred and cared for at the ARI’s own preclinical facility
Species selection is based on scientific relevance, ethical justification, and regulatory approval, with a preference for species with lower sentience whenever possible.
Animal care and welfare
Animal welfare is an integral part of research at the ARI. Measures include:
- species-appropriate housing and environmental enrichment
- continuous supervision by veterinarians specialized in laboratory animal medicine
- trained animal care and research staff
- ongoing monitoring of animal well-being
The ARI is part of the Swiss program of the European College of Laboratory Animal Medicine (ECLAM), which certifies specialists in laboratory animal medicine. The Diploma and Specialist titles are the highest qualifications for laboratory animal veterinarians in Europe.
Stephan Zeiter, the leader of the Preclinical Services Program (also an ECLAM specialist) received the Swiss Culture of Care Award in 2024, demonstrating the team's dedication to animal welfare.
All animal studies at the AO must be approved by the Cantonal Supervisory Commission for Animal Experimentation in Graubünden. A harm-benefit analysis is conducted to compare the harm and suffering animals might experience to the knowledge gained from the studies and their relevance for science and society. This limits animal studies to an indispensable minimum. The cantonal authorities also conduct regular inspections, both announced and unannounced, of the animal facilities at the ARI to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and licenses.
The ARI’s preclinical facility adheres to high standards that exceed legal requirements. It is certified according to ISO 9001:2015 and accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). The AAALAC is a private, non-profit organization that promotes the humane treatment of animals in science through voluntary accreditation and assessment programs. It endorses the use of animals to advance medicine and science when no non-animal alternatives are available and when it is done in an ethical and humane way.
The ARI is also an officially recognized GLP test facility. GLP is an internationally recognized quality system for the organizational process and conditions under which non-clinical health and environmental safety studies are planned, performed, monitored, recorded, archived, and reported. All these accreditations demonstrate the ARI's commitment to meeting the highest research standards.
Use of sheep in preclinical research
When animal research is necessary, the ARI uses sheep as a large animal model in some preclinical studies because they provide scientifically relevant insights that cannot be obtained from smaller animal models alone.
Sheep are widely used in orthopedic research because they enable the evaluation of biomechanics, implant performance, and healing processes under conditions that better reflect clinical reality.
They have bone size, structure, and remodeling characteristics closer to those of humans than to those of rodents. This makes them a well-established model for studying bone healing and regeneration, fracture fixation, and orthopedic implants and biomaterials.
Sheep are used at the ARI only when a research question cannot be answered using alternative methods or smaller animal models. Their use is always subject to:
- ethical review
- legal approval
- application of the 3R principles
Specific pathogen free (SPF) sheep facility
As part of its preclinical infrastructure, the ARI operates a specific pathogen free (SPF) sheep facility.
“Specific pathogen free” refers to animals that are free of a defined list of pathogens that could otherwise:
- affect animal health and welfare
- interfere with research results
- introduce variability unrelated to the research question
SPF conditions are considered both a welfare measure and a scientific quality measure. SPF facilities are designed to prevent the introduction of these pathogens through controlled access, hygiene measures, and continuous health monitoring.
The SPF sheep facility was developed to meet an unmet need in Europe for pathogen-controlled large animal research while maintaining high animal welfare standards.
Other animals at the ARI, like mice, rats, and rabbits, are obtained with SPF-status from certified breeders.
Euthanasia
In most preclinical studies at the ARI, animals need to be euthanized at the end of a study. This is never a routine decision and is taken only when it is scientifically justified, ethically approved, and legally required.
In orthopedic and musculoskeletal research, certain questions cannot be answered in living subjects. This includes the assessment of:
- bone–implant integration
- bone micro- and macro-structure
- tissue responses at the implant or fracture site
Histological and biomechanical analyses—which require direct examination of bones and surrounding tissues—are often essential to validate healing, implant performance, and safety before clinical use. These analyses can only be performed after the animal has been humanely euthanized.
Euthanasia may also be necessary to prevent suffering at the conclusion of a study. In this context, euthanasia is considered part of responsible animal welfare practice. Whenever euthanasia is not necessary at the end of a study, efforts are made to rehome the animals.
Swiss frameworks explicitly recognize euthanasia as ethically permissible when justified by overriding scientific or animal welfare interests and when no alternative exists.
-
FAQs
Why does the ARI conduct research involving animals?
The ARI always seeks to apply the best research method available to answer the research question at hand. Some questions in musculoskeletal research—particularly those involving complex biological systems like our immune system—cannot yet be answered using non animal methods alone. Animal research is conducted only when necessary and legally approved.
Are alternatives to animal research used?
Yes. The ARI actively develops and applies alternative methods and uses animals only when these approaches are insufficient to answer the research question.
How is animal welfare ensured?
All studies are reviewed by authorities and conducted by veterinarians specialized in laboratory animal medicine. The animals are cared for by trained animal caretakers and are under continuous veterinary supervision. Procedures and housing are refined to minimize stress and suffering.
How many animals are used?
Animal numbers vary by study and are determined through ethical review.
In 2025, a total of 414 animals were used. This included 297 mice, 22 rats, 60 rabbits, and 35 sheep.
Swiss legislation categorizes animal experiments into four levels of severity, ranging from no distress (severity level 0) to severe distress (severity level 3). In 2025, 86% of the animals used at ARI had a severity level of 2 or 3, since almost all studies involve surgery, which is considered at least severity level 2.
Why does the ARI perform animal studies of the highest severity degree?
Examining the processes of bone healing almost always involves a surgical procedure on the bone, which counts as severity level 2 under Swiss law. For these surgeries, the animals are anesthetized and treated with pain medication so that they don’t feel any pain during or after the surgery.
One very important topic that can’t be fully understood in vitro is fracture-related infection, due to the complex immune system involved. These infections are a high burden for humans and lead to several additional complications, and finding treatments against them often involves animal experiments. These fracture-related infections also impose an additional burden on the animals, leading to severity level 3. The animals in these studies are monitored closely by veterinarians to ensure the least possible burden.
Why doesn’t the ARI use only mice or rats?
Some questions—such as testing human-scale implants or studying complex bone healing under realistic mechanical conditions—require a large-animal model.
What is an SPF sheep facility?
An SPF sheep facility houses animals that are free of specific pathogens, using controlled housing and monitoring to protect animal welfare and ensure reliable research results.
Who oversees animal research at the ARI?
Animal research is overseen by cantonal authorities and subject to inspections. An on-site Animal Welfare Officer reviews all studies before their start. Ethical review and legal approval are mandatory for every study.
Are animals euthanized as part of research at the ARI?
Yes. We understand that the topic of euthanasia can be emotionally difficult, and we approach this responsibility with compassion and care for the animals involved. Euthanasia is used only when scientifically necessary or to prevent suffering, and it is performed according to strict legal and ethical standards under veterinary supervision.
Why can’t animals be rehomed after a study?
In most cases, rehoming is not possible because implants or surgical interventions require detailed post study analysis of bone and tissue, or because continued housing would not be in the animal’s best welfare interest. Each case is assessed individually.
How can the public learn more?
The ARI is committed to transparency and provides information when questions arise. This webpage is part of that commitment. If you have any further questions or would like to visit our preclinical facility, please contact XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
You may also be interested in this episode of the SRF program “Einstein” (only available in German).